Vr6 - GTI Ball joint extenders (again..)

Discussion in 'Track Prep & Tech' started by Pb81, Jan 21, 2015.

  1. Notso Swift Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Likes Received:
    65
    McGill stuff is great... for throttle linkages, maybe a ARB mount, but structual like that...

    Even with quality rose joint, my experience on a mini suggests fully exposed I doubt that would last 1000km, no probs on track but no good on road
     
  2. RobT

    RobT Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Likes Received:
    975
    Location:
    Cheshire
    my radical sr8 front upper wishbone connects to the upright via a rod end, but an NMB rod end....

    the bottom wishbone connects via a spherical bearing as used in the scch kit. thats the way to do it.
     
  3. aminder

    aminder CGTI Committee - Webmaster Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Likes Received:
    213
    Location:
    Leicester
    Did we ever make any movement on this? I'd be interested and I reckon couple of other guys would be also.
     
  4. sparrow Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Likes Received:
    741
    Location:
    Leamington Spa
  5. Pb81 Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Rome, Italy
    I have no authorization to see the GB, can someone authorize me?

    Btw i'm going to one more direction too, but i need some measurments from you guys since i'm living far from home these months.
    I'm playing with CAD and i'd need the measurmentes in red in the picture, MK3 VR6/GTI version, hole distances and base thickness.
    Can someone help me?

    Thanks

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2015
  6. sparrow Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Likes Received:
    741
    Location:
    Leamington Spa
    Group buys are for paid members only. Pay your 10 to save much more. :thumbup:
     
  7. Pb81 Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Rome, Italy
    That's what i just did :thumbup:
    Is it automatic now?
     
  8. sparrow Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Likes Received:
    741
    Location:
    Leamington Spa
    Good man.
    No, it takes a few days, but I'll add you so long. What do you want to order?
     
  9. Pb81 Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Rome, Italy
    I'm interested in bj group buy, i'd like to have some information, could you give me some infos via pm?
    Thanks
     
  10. sparrow Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Likes Received:
    741
    Location:
    Leamington Spa
    PM incoming
     
  11. sparrow Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Likes Received:
    741
    Location:
    Leamington Spa
    Or not. You're over your PM limit.
     
  12. Pb81 Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Rome, Italy
    Again available, thanks!

    Edit:
    But will they produce the 5studs version? I can see only 4 studs chassis products..
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2015
  13. Pb81 Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Rome, Italy
    I have de design, i'm trying to get some quotes here in rome, now the question:
    How many people interested in VR6 extenders?
    Do you know some honest machiner to get quote too?
    Thanks :-)
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2015
  14. Dave R

    Dave R Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Likes Received:
    132
    Location:
    Rhondda
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    nice level lower arms with the rose jointed track rod ends upside down for improved bump steer.
     
  15. twolitrepinto Forum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2012
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    Hastings, East Sussex
    Correct me if i'm wrong but dont you want the arms pointing down? especially when there is not an engine in the car yet?

    i thought that the idea is the arms be straight in a 'bump' situation.
    if the arms are straight with no weight in the car, they will be pointing upwards with weight in or in a bump, which would result in toe out and bump steer.

    arent the arms meant to be level at or close to the top of the suspensions travel?

    just a thought...
     
  16. mec82 Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Likes Received:
    9
    The ideal thing to do is drop the ball joint as low as possible, regardless of the Wishbone angle.

    I would design extenders to drop the joint as low as possible while fitting inside the smallest wheel space. For most people this will be a 15" wheel.

    Sent from my E2303 using Tapatalk
     
  17. RobT

    RobT Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Likes Received:
    975
    Location:
    Cheshire
    The arms want to be level at the average point of suspension travel when the car is being used. At this point there is minimum camber change. Same reason why single seaters have very long wishbones - minimum amount camber change per unit of deflection. So this is going to need a downward pointing wishbone under static conditions.
     
  18. mec82 Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Likes Received:
    9
    Good point but not sure id totally agree with that,mcpherson strut loses camber under bump.We need all the camber we can get so starting at the lowest possible position seems a best option to me

    Sent from my E2303 using Tapatalk
     
  19. Nige

    Nige Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Likes Received:
    2,138
    But on the picture above, the wishbones are level without an engine in the car. Once you fit that, they`ll be pointing up (from the subframe to the hub) which you don`t want. Cornering will make it even worse.

    I must admit, I missed that when I saw the photo yesterday, good spot twolitrepinto
     
  20. Dave R

    Dave R Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Likes Received:
    132
    Location:
    Rhondda
    So we are saying that ideally I want the lower arms pointing down, when under its own weight with the engine in?

    Handling should be improved now then compared to my original set up because they were pointing up a lot more when under its own weight with the engine before the extensions were fitted.

    With a 110kg bloke standing on the chassis legs the car only dropped about 10mm.

    So therefore if the lower arms stay in the current position with the engine in, in a "bump" situation the steering arms will become level so the bump steer effect will be resolved.

    And even if it doesn't reach the ideal position of the lower arms it is still much much closer to this position than I was before therefore it will improve my handling?

    Interesting facts and although my set up won't reach the ideal position I will be much closer to them than what I was originally.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2015

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice