Guide: DIY charge-air water cooler build (intercooling)

Discussion in 'Turbocharged, Supercharged or Nitrous !' started by Admin, Jun 7, 2013.

  1. Admin Guest

    So, it's all to do with flow. That's the reasoning behind it all. I will get my ruler tomorrow.
     
  2. tshirt2k

    tshirt2k Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Likes Received:
    325
    Location:
    Herts
    Corky did mention about flow area increased, but didnt say the normal way had higher losses.

    2nd paragraph 1st page, says most breaker/oem coolers will have water through tubes due to size.

    Area measurement will tell all.
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2013
  3. sambo Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Likes Received:
    441
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Good thread, interesting reading to be had, cheers lads

    Great job on Diy-ing by the way !
     
  4. Admin Guest

    Ok, I got the digi calipers out and measured each of the tubes to work out the total areas for std and reversed flow for my core.

    First up the way I'm running the boost, in std flow through the extrudes, the core is Low density this way, see pic below. The cross sectional area is 8.184inch2 and for 230bhp I require 8.05inch2 so I'm just over the minimum limit.

    Running in reverse as, the core is high density with twice as many vanes. The cross sectional area is 25.2inch2 and for 230bhp I require a minimum of 13.8inch2.

    Running reverse is less efficient as per C. Corky says with the extra vane density affecting the pressure drop so I will continue to run it in the std way with the more efficient extruded tubes. It also means the boosted air is in the cooling tubes formuch longer allowing greater copling to take place. If I do want more BHP I will have to upgrade or remake my charge-air cooler.

    I will add more info to the opening post about core area and selection so others can work out what size core they need.


    Pics of core to follow.

    Std boosted path, low density core.

    [​IMG]

    Reversed ambient air path, high density core note double number of vanes.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 10, 2013
  5. Admin Guest

    Not the extract from the book quotes hp per inch2, if this book is American it possibly refers to WheelHP and would therefore give me an even greater margin if this is the case, however, I have assumed it to be FlywheelHP to be on the safe side.
     
  6. tshirt2k

    tshirt2k Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Likes Received:
    325
    Location:
    Herts
    How long is the core? Is it less 10"?
     
  7. Admin Guest

    It is 8inch long so the latter of the two described in the article is best if the cross sectional area is big enough, which it just is. (ie the way I am running it).
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice