16v inlet manifolds

Discussion in '16-valve' started by dohc, Apr 24, 2004.

  1. Tubthumped Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Hebden Bridge
    My Stock 2.0 does well enough with the 52mm

    [:D]
     
  2. prof Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2003
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Suffragette City
    you running the ABF mani then, well I guess thats probably the pic of the bunch
     
  3. GVK

    GVK Paid Member Paid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2003
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    Lincs.
    Abf manifold? Tub's on K-Jet.;)

    Surely he means 50mm. [:[]
    Edited by: G_V_K
     
  4. MuffinMan New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United States
    Does any have a custom fab'ed sheet metal intake manifold?
     
  5. matt d Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Antarctica
    The perfect answer :clap:
    Gary, i meant the same car ;)
     
  6. HidRo Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Portugal
    yes,mine is a 1.8l KR
     
  7. Tubthumped Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Hebden Bridge
    Yeah -- meant 50.

    Anyway... it still does well on that! ;) :lol:
     
  8. ianb Forum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Likes Received:
    14
    Are they that far apart.....whats the fuss??
    Whats a few lbs here or there?
    Funily I 'm looking at experimenting my 50mm inlet further

    Ian
     
  9. HidRo Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Portugal
    i already have mine,and its painted cool [:D]
    and its quite a diference in size!
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  10. Viper Forum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2003
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    That does look pretty nice Hidro. I'm too lazy to bother with stuff like that :lol:! Standard for me! ;)
     
  11. JefM New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello!
    Kinda new here but might have some usefull experience in with the 42/50mm.

    I drive a VW Corrado 16V with the CIS-Motronic 9A.

    Had the engine rebuild at 90k miles (peace of mind) and added some Kent GF1602R (264/258deg) cams, a ported head and 83.5mm pistons, kept the 42mm.

    Car felt stronger througout the rev range...but was still a little lazy and not rev happy enough for me.

    Due to lack of time it took me a year before I got a 50mm on it. But a massive change in engine behaviour.

    Lost loads of torque below 3500rpm...town cruising is no fun at all.
    Gained a lot above 5000rpm and now feels like a 16V should (IMHO). Whenever driving hard and not paying attention to rev counter...BANG...Rev limiter at 7300rpm.
    (Made some funny engine vibrarions round 3000rpm disappear too).

    Car hasn't seen a RR yet so no remap either.
    Supersprint exhaust system is fitted (incl. cat replacement). Original manifold though.

    So far for my experiences.

    Greetz
    Jef

    Think the torque loss in an MKII should be less noticeable.
    Edited by: JefM
     
  12. HidRo Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Portugal
    i say it again.i had none(to litle,not noticiable) torque loss in low revs.but in high,how man! [:D] one of these days,i might make a film with a digital camera.
     
  13. scos Forum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Woh, what a thread! Never thought we could manage this much discussion of the 16V inlet manifold....well done guys :lol:

    One thing still unanswered for me though...
    What is the significance of the blue writing? :lol:

    I've had 3 valvers recently, all 90-spec, one had blue writing the other two didn't. As far as I was aware they were all 50mm inlets. So I guess it's irrelevant then :lol:

    As for power/torque gains, I can say for sure that reducing the back pressure on the exhaust side improves the top end power (or free-revving) but reduces low-down torque. I would imagine a similar rule applies for the intake, but I have no experience of messing around the manifolds....yet ;)
     
  14. Golden Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    2
    scos this not a personal dig :) but one of my pet hates/rants is the fact that there is no such thing as "exhaust back pressure" I know this seems anal but the term is misleading for people trying to understand exhaust systems and manifolds.
     
  15. prof Forum Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2003
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Suffragette City
    thats cos yours is a 1.8, his is a 2.0, like I explained earlier ;) :lol:
     
  16. HidRo Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Portugal
    ye ye ye,just making my point ;)
    get it in!!!

    owning page 4!! :clap:
    Edited by: HidRo
     
  17. Tubthumped Forum Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Hebden Bridge
    hmmm...

    We can weld anything at work, and the guys there are amazing... so, what do you rekon to me getting the larger plenum (off a 42????) and welding it to my 50mm....?
     
  18. HidRo Forum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Portugal
    from what i can recall,it gained 1hp or 2,and lost some trq.leave it alone [:D]
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice